|
|||
1 IntroductionDuring the last 5 years of talking to active undergraduate students, I have heard comments to paraphrase: I don’t know that APX is quite ready to handle sponge paint decoration yet; now that I have lived in the chapter house for 3 years and looked closer, I can see many flaws that newness clouded the details as a pledge, and the latest… Just how did APX get into this condition and what are YOU going to do about it? The role of each of these students has been that of the House Superintendent. They very often realize the magnitude of the tasks and are frustrated by the amount of work; the extent of planning and huge costs involved as they get familiar with the chapter house. APX was placed on the National Register of Historic Places because it is not only architecturally significant and representative of Greek Lettered Buildings, but also because of of the persons who have been involved with over the years. During the late 1960’s and 1970’s the University of Illinois was in a student housing expansion during which the popular housing type of Fraternities flourished. Many chapter houses were hungry to expand their prime campus property knowing the history of successful occupancy. Many chapter houses expanded the primary façade and enlarged study room occupancy, with little need to expand the already gracious commons spaces. This modification eliminated their possibility of National Register nominations until the addition itself claims 50 years of historic status. Alpha Rho Chi not only did not add onto their square footage; because of a lack of funds and limited membership APX did not even modify, repair, upgrade, nor remodel. Therefore with its pristine, pure, unchanged historic fabric APX easily met the National Registry requirement, but unfortunately major building systems such as roof; masonry exterior, chimneys, heating distribution/energy efficiency and interior finishes such as floors, plaster, doors and windows are in need of repair after over 80 years of consumption as well as accomplish required life safety upgrades. During 1927, a new chapter house was breaking ground at U of I for a new fraternal building each mont., During the 1990’s more than 1 or 2 chapter houses were being torn down each year. The recent issue of life safety “grand fathering” has been re-evaluated by the University of Illinois and City of Champaign prompted by high risk occupancy and numerous examples of death and injury in chapter houses. See “Fire Safety Student Housing” October 1999. Commonly documented causes from 1979 to 1998 include: occupant behavior activates such as candles and cigarettes, some arson, and electrical fires resulting in fatality and injury. The inspection process for approved housing not only enforces life safety code but also property maintenance; National codes such as National Electric Code and intends to enforce these regulations. Not only are major life safety issues being enforced such as compartmentalization, egress upgrades, and automatic sprinkler system/alarm systems, but also the intent will remain to annually pursue property maintenance, and life safety systems. We should expect that improper maintenance and lack of cleanliness will aggravate the inspection process. During the 1990’s compartmentalization and egress upgrade was enforced when the City of Champaign adopted 1991 BOCA Code. Many university approved houses fought, argued, and litigated, resulting in numerous chapter houses closing. Many chapter houses became U of I parking lots or a campus apartment on stilts with aluminum siding. We must now plan for our future and determine how to successfully operate, maintain and upgrade this fraternity for students of architecture, fine arts and allied studies. Our plan must include a timely solution to code issues at hand; sprinkler, gutters, roof and exterior painting, future life safety and property maintenance code violations; method of normal repair and maintenance; operations, and depreciated items; occupancy issues and a time table. In short: “show me the way” issues have been outlined to study and discuss, which will help us to develop the master plan. Each person will see this plan differently and a group should evaluate these issues and make recommendations to the Control Corporation of APX. The U of I fraternal system still boasts of a substantial Greek system. Actually today a similar population lives in fewer chapter houses with greater density. The future will be that of the survival of the fittest. 1.1 Good NewsAlpha Rho Chi interiors have never cosmetically looked better, we are better organized, we have an Alumni Association and an active chapter interested, supportive and, proud of our historic building. More attention has been given to the building in the last 10 years, than ever in its history. 1.2 PrioritiesEach person who is evaluating this list would prioritize differently, but this is suggested criteria. It is impossible to look into a crystal ball and know what minor flaw can become a major structural issue so as time goes by the priorities change. When the boiler failed (long overdue) it became #1 priority and we were forced without advanced planning to “put out another fire.” When the chimney flue caved-in and shut down the boiler and water heaters over Christmas break, that work became a “must do” item at the wrong time of the year. When the pipes froze and destroyed plaster… when the stair structure started “moving” the priority list changed regardless of cash flow. With this vintage building, some exploratory holes have been made, revealing deficiencies. Because the building repairs and upgrade were ignored for 50 years, here are several items that could become #1 priorities and cause new “squeaks.”
1.3 Intent StatementThis report was primarily for backup to explain most items of work on the list and are a description of major issues, but not all issues. This scope is primarily attending to major building and life safety issues at hand and not necessarily future or specific user needs, environmental or operational concerns, or upgrades. Air Conditioning was only recently stated as a need due to interest in possibly alternative building use such as the “Discover Architecture” Program. |
| ||
Last updated: 28-Jan-2007 by snachtigall |
|||